Comments and claims on Aristotle's Categorieshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en_USCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International LicenseThis data file is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
License. The license is granted independent of rights and licenses associated with
the source. tag:parkj@textalign.net,2015:TAN-key:ar.catKeywords for Aristotle's Categoriestag:kalvesmaki.com,2014:tan-t:ar.cat.grc.1949.minio-paluello:object-refsCategories, Aristotle, Greek text by Minio-Paluellotag:kalvesmaki.com,2014:tan-t:ar.cat.eng.1926.edghill:model-object-refsCategories, Aristotle, Greek text by Minio-Paluellotag:textalign.net,2015:stylesheet:convert-tan2018-to-tan2020Stylesheet to create a TAN file.https://inpho.cogs.indiana.edu/thinker/2532http://dbpedia.org/resource/Andronicus_of_RhodesAndronicus of Rhodeshttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Boethus_of_SidonBoethus of Sidonhttp://dbpedia.org/resource/DexippusDexippushttp://dbpedia.org/resource/HerminusHerminushttp://dbpedia.org/resource/Porphyry_(Philosopher)Porphyryhttp://viaf.org/viaf/9855932/Lorenzo Minio-Paluellotag:parkj@textalign.net,2015:person:ita:milan:ambrosianus:L-93:manus-recentiorAnonymous scribeA person who sometime after the ninth century added 13a1-30.http://dbpedia.org/resource/BoethiusAnicius Manlius Severinus Boëthiushttp://viaf.org/viaf/103637653http://syriaca.org/work/49Sergius of Reshainahttp://viaf.org/viaf/50027842http://syriaca.org/work/113Jacob of Edessahttp://viaf.org/viaf/88628511http://syriaca.org/work/122George, Bishop of the Arabstag:textalign.net,2015:work:aristotle:categories:translation:armenianAnonymous Armenian translation5th-c. translation once ascribed to a translator named David.tag:textalign.net,2015:work:aristotle:categories:translation:latinLatin translation of Aristotle's Categories by Anicius Manlius Severinus
Boëthiustag:textalign.net,2015:work:aristotle:categories:translation:syriac:sergiusSyriac translation of Aristotle's Categories by Sergius of Reshainatag:textalign.net,2015:work:aristotle:categories:translation:syriac:jacobSyriac translation of Aristotle's Categories by Jacob of Edessatag:textalign.net,2015:work:aristotle:categories:translation:syriac:georgeSyriac translation of Aristotle's Categories by George, Bishop of the
Arabstag:parkj@textalign.net,2015:scriptum:ita:milan:ambrosianus:L-93Ambrosianus L 93saec. ixtag:parkj@textalign.net,2015:scriptum:ita:venezia:marcianus:201Marcianus 201saec. xtag:parkj@textalign.net,2015:verb:omitsomitsomits textThe subject omits/omitted certain textThis verb is similar to the standard TAN verb
"lacks", but expands the definition to persons.tag:parkj@textalign.net,2015:verb:attests-toattestsattests toThe subject attests to the text found in the objectThis verb is similar to the standard TAN verb
"matches", but expands the definition to persons.tag:parkj@textalign.net,2015:selfJenny Parktag:kimr@textalign.net,2015:selfRobin Kimhttp://schema.org/creatorcreatortag:parkj@textalign.net,2015:period:late-antiquitylate antiquityRoughly starting in the second to fourth century and finishing from the sixth
to ninth, depending upon the context. Late antiquity tends to be later than you
think.Started fileConverted from 2018 to 2019 schemas.Revised claims to match proper nomenclature.Revised to correct use of element at.Finish file. Only the first couple of claims have been filled in.The next two claims interpret Minio-Paluello's
apparatus criticus entry for 1a2, which claims that Andronicus and Boethus might have
omitted τῆς οὐσίας (based on what Porphyry and Dexippus say) and asserts that the
reading adopted is found in the seven commentators. The interpretation below sticks
close to M-P's original, and does not fill in important gaps. For example, Dexippus's
remark comes from his commentary, 1.18 (p. 21.20) and is reliant wholly on a fragment of
Porphyry preserved in Simplicius's commentary, p. 30.1-2. Furthermore, a careful reading
of these texts shows that Porphyry claimed not that Andronicus and Boethus omitted the
text, or relied on sources that had omitted it, but that they observed that there were
manuscripts that had done so.The next three claims assert that the reading, ἀποδιδῷ
τις, is attested to by π α φ ο but B transposes the words, and perhaps Boethius does as
well. The claim sticks close to M-P's syntax, and does not fill in statements he would
expect an intelligent reader to supply, e.g., that the claim is not that Boethius's
translation perhaps transposed the words, but that Boethius was perhaps following one or
more Greek manuscripts that did.